{ "@context": "http://iiif.io/api/presentation/3/context.json", "id": "https://budc.barry.edu/iiif/manifest/AA00001321/00001", "type": "Manifest", "label": { "none": [ "Differences in eyewitness accuracy amongst the deaf and hearing population" ] }, "metadata": [ { "label": { "en": [ "Abstract" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "The purpose of the current study was to clarify the advantages and disadvantages, if any, that deaf individuals have within their perceptual experience of a crime. To investigate this research question, volunteer participants were exposed to a brief video clip of a crime event and had their memory for the event tested through open and closed ended questions in an electronic survey format. Participants were classified into 3 groups: (1) those who identify as culturally Deaf, (2) hearing participants who watched the crime event with sound, and (3) hearing participants who watched the crime event without sound. It was hypothesized that Deaf individuals would have superior memory recall (i.e., higher accuracy), for \u201Cperipheral\u201D details compared to \u201Ccentral\u201D details when compared to the hearing individuals without sound, and that accuracy may vary as a function of the type of question asked (open versus closed-ended). A 3 (participant type: hearing with sound vs. hearing without sound vs. Deaf) x 2 (question type: open vs. closed) x 2 (detail type: central vs. peripheral) mixed Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to examine the interacting effects of experimental group and two within subject variables, question type and detail type, on the primary dependent variable: accuracy rate (e.g., the proportion of correct details out of all details provided). The analysis revealed a main effect of detail type on participant accuracy, F(2, 166) = 123.10, p \u003C .001, partial \u03B72 = .43. Participants were more accurate when answering questions about details classified as central (M = .69, SD = .14) compared to peripheral (M = .45, SD = .23). Another main effect was revealed of question type on participant accuracy, F(1, 166) = 174.33, p \u003C .001, partial \u03B72= .51. Overall, participants were more accurate when answering open ended questions (M = .79, SD = .14) compared to closed ended questions (M = .46, SD = .18). This effect was qualified by a significant detail type by question type interaction, F(2, 166) = 54.49, p \u003C .001, partial \u03B72 = .25. The effect of question type on participant\u2019s accuracy rates was more pronounced for central details compared to peripheral details, all p\u2019s \u003C .001. Lastly, a marginal effect of participant type on accuracy was revealed, F(2, 166) = 2.96, p = .055, partial \u03B72 = .03. Hearing participants who viewed the video with sound tended to be more accurate overall compared to hearing participants who viewed the video without sound (hearing control group) and Deaf participants. However, this marginal effect should be interpreted within a significant question by participant type interaction, F(2, 166) = 3.88, p = .023, partial \u03B72 = .05. Hearing participants\u2019 accuracy was less impacted by the question type compared to the other groups. The current study\u2019s primary hypothesis that Deaf individuals would have better accuracy of details for an experienced crime due to perceptual advantages was not supported. Interestingly, hearing participants were less influenced by the type of question asked (closed-ended vs. open-ended) and tended to be more accurate overall regardless of detail type (peripherally vs. centrally presented details). The second hypothesis that Deaf individuals have better recall for peripherally presented details vs. centrally presented details was not fully supported; however, Deaf participants performed significantly more accurate than hearing controls on peripheral details. This finding provides some support for previous literature that has linked Deaf individuals to having better recall (i.e., higher accuracy) for peripherally presented details vs. centrally presented details." ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Classification" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "HV8073.G37 2019" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Publication Date" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "2019" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Genre" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "Academic theses" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Holding Location" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "Barry University Archives and Special Collections" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Resource Identifier" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "HV8073.G37 2019_GarciaAmanda" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Language" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "English" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Permanent Link" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "http://sobekcmsrv.barrynet.barry.edu/AA00001321/00001" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Creator" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "Garcia, Amanda" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Note" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "Thesis (M.S.)--Barry University, 2019", "Includes bibliographical references (leaves 46-56)." ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Physical Description" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "62 leaves ; 28 cm" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Publisher" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "Barry University" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Place of Publication" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "Miami, Fla." ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Type" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "Book" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Rights Management" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "Copyright Amanda Garcia. Permission granted to Barry University to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder." ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Source Institution" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "Barry University" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Subjects / Keywords" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "Eyewitness identification", "Criminal investigation", "Deaf", "Hearing impaired" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Degree Disciplines" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "Psychology" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Title" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "Differences in eyewitness accuracy amongst the deaf and hearing population" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Series Title" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "Barry University Theses -- College of Arts and Sciences \u2013 Psychology" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Format" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "Book" ] } }, { "label": { "en": [ "Digital Resource Creation Date" ] }, "value": { "none": [ "3/27/2020" ] } } ], "service": [ { "@context": "http://iiif.io/api/search/2/context.json", "id": "https://budc.barry.edu/iiif/manifest/AA00001321/00001/search", "type": "SearchService2", "profile": "http://iiif.io/api/search/2/search" } ], "seeAlso": [ { "id": "https://budc.barry.edu/content/AA/00/00/13/21/00001/AA00001321_00001.mets.xml", "type": "Dataset", "format": "application/mets\u002Bxml", "label": { "en": "METS" } }, { "id": "https://budc.barry.edu/content/AA/00/00/13/21/00001/marc.xml", "type": "Dataset", "format": "application/marcxml\u002Bxml", "label": { "en": "MARCXML" } } ], "items": [] }